Home Programs Faculty Research Curriculum Center Public Resources My Account
Member Sign In
Shopping Cart  
My Account
My E-Packets
Browse Bibliography:
By Keywords:

By Type:
New/Updated Items
Popular Items
Background Notes
Primers and Books

By Functional Area:
Finance/Financial Management
Financial Accounting
Financial Analysis and Management
General Management
Management Accounting
Management Control Systems
Operations Management
Organizational Behavior

By Setting:
Developing Country
For Profit
Health Policy
Healthcare Management
Nonprofit Organization Management
Public Sector Management

Curriculum Center Browse Bibliography Build EPacket Pricing Structure Distribution Process Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations
Note on Methodological Issues in Social Science Research
Young, David W.
Functional Area(s):
   General Management
Difficulty Level: Advanced
Pages: 10
Teaching Note: Not Available. 
Copyright Clearance Fee:  $8.20  Sign in to find out if you are eligible for an Academic Price of $4.25 
Add Item to a new E-Packet

Add To Cart

Order an Free Inspection Copy

Back to Bibliography
First Page and the Assignment Questions:

The development of theory in the social sciences frequently has been frustrated by the lack of a clear consensus on a number of issues. Among the more divisive are the following: description versus prescription; reflection versus action orientation; deduction versus induction; verifiability versus falsifiability; quantitative versus qualitative; case method versus statistical.

Because of the variety of possible combinations within this list, researchers fall into one or more camps depending on their proclivities and the research issue under discussion. Further polarization is created by the frequent lack of a distinction between two questions: (1) What constitutes a “good” theory? and (2) What is an appropriate methodology for the construction of such a theory? This note discusses these two questions, and suggests some ways to resolve them.

It should be stressed at the outset that there is no “right” (or even “best”) answer to the question of the most appropriate research methodology. There is a need, however, for each researcher to develop a methodological position that he or she believes is appropriate, and can defend as valid and useful. The discussion in this note presents one such position.